The week's headlines point to slowing growth in
the labor market and a deepening deficit for the trade balance, the
former easing pressure on the Federal Reserve to raise rates and the
latter adding urgency to the rising struggle between the U.S. and
China. But these indications could in the end prove a clumsy head fake
given some less visible signals in the week, evidence that underlying
demand (including consumer demand) may in fact be accelerating.
The economy
The
labor market may not be quite as strong as thought. March payroll
growth of 103,000 came in well below expectations and the unemployment
rate, instead of moving lower as many had expected, held steady at 4.1
percent. Revisions are also a factor, lowering growth in the two prior
months by a net 50,000 and pulling down the first quarter's average to
202,000 which is below the fourth quarter's 221,000. But there are
positives in the March report including another solid showing for
manufacturing, up 22,000, and also a 33,000 gain for professional &
business services. Yet in an offset the key subcomponent for the
latter, temporary help, actually fell 1,000. Other areas of weakness
include a 15,000 decline for construction payrolls, which had been on
the rise, and a 4,000 dip for retail which had been showing strength.
Not
weak, however, is the wage signal from average hourly earnings which
rose 0.3 percent. The trend for this monthly rate has been edging
higher to between 0.3 and 0.2 percent despite being held down by
February's soft 0.1 percent showing. If this rate begins to post
consistent 0.3 percent gains, expectations for less friendly monetary
policy would build quickly. Note the spike and drop in September and
October which are hurricane effects that are common in the graphs for
2017. Also note that average hourly earnings are the first inflation
reading for any one month, setting the tone for following readings
including the consumer price report which, for March, will be posted in
the coming week.
But
policy goals for inflation are in year-on-year terms and here too,
slight upward movement is visible. Average hourly earnings on this basis
rose 1 tenth in March to 2.7 percent which may hint, at least
indirectly, at an improving slope for general prices including the
Fed's core PCE index. The Fed's stated expectation for the core (and
this is what first unhinged the stock market back at the January FOMC)
is for gradual but tangible improvement this year to the 2 percent
line. But unlike average hourly earnings, the core rate hasn't been
showing much lift at all, at least yet.
Whether
demand for labor re-accelerates will depend on the strength of the
economy including cross-border trade. A U.S.-China tariff war would of
course limit overall trade but in as much as it would limit imports in
relation to exports, the war could be a positive for GDP where imports
are a subtraction. Going into the metal tariffs of March, imports were
on the rise and were deepening the deficit, totaling $57.6 billion in
February. February was the fourth straight $50 billion showing in a
curve that continues to sink. Imports rose 1.7 percent to $262.0
billion in the month, far higher than the $204.4 billion in exports
which however also rose 1.7 percent in a healthy gain that we'll break
down in a moment. But for GDP, net exports don't look like they'll be
contributing much, to say the least, to the first quarter.
With
all the talk about cross-border weakness, let's look at centers of
strength for U.S. trade. Services are at the forefront, extending their
steady climb to an impressive $67.3 billion in March and well out in
front of imported services at $47.8 billion. This is the kind of mix
that is most healthy, a nation producing something in demand not
because of low prices but because of its excellence. Exports of U.S.
intellectual property have been climbing sharply as have insurance
services, financial services and telecommunications & information
services. Of all the things the U.S. produces, it's the nation's
technicial and managerial expertise that is in highest demand.
Also
in high demand are U.S. capital goods, from machinery to heavy
equipment to aircraft. But here unlike services, the nation imports more
than it exports, at $57.8 billion for related imports in February vs
$45.6 billion for exports. Tariffs targeted here would of course raise
prices and could end up lowering business investment, whether for U.S.
firms buying foreign equipment or foreign firms buying U.S. equipment.
Such a result would eat depper into the central weakness of the global
economy and that is low productivity growth. This is a reminder that
tariffs have more than immediate effects, but long-term ramifications
on global production capacity.
Now
let's turn to a smaller component where the U.S. also does well: the
import and export of foods, specifically foods, feeds & beverages as
tracked by the government. Here the nation runs a mostly even trade
balance, at $10.7 billion for February exports vs $11.9 billion for
imports. Yet, looking at recent results, imports have been deepening
slightly while exports have been flat. Tariffs on food not only get big
headlines, but any resulting inflationary effects would be quickly
visible to the consumer and quickly registered in the consumer price
report.
An
ongoing inflationary risk is being signaled by the delivery indexes of
both the ISM manufacturing and non-manufacturing reports. The
manufacturing reading, at 60.6, has been above 60 for two straight
months while that for non-manufacturing, at 58.5, is also severe. Aside
from the recent hurricane season, it was back in 2005 and 2004, at the
height of the prior expansion, that these readings have been this
high. What this means is that business is heavy and orders are taking
longer to ship in what is a very clear indication of capacity stress.
And it's not just ISM's samples that are complaining of lengthening
times with similar results found in other private and regional surveys
as well. It should be no surprise that inflation readings in these
surveys are also on the climb, at a 7-year high of 78.1 for the ISM
manufacturing prices paid index and at 61.5 for non-manufacturing which,
for the first time in 3-1/2 years, has posted three straight plus 60
readings.
Another
sleeper in the week's data is a very welcome jump in vehicle sales.
Unit sales rose to a 17.5 million annualized rate in March for the best
showing so far this year. Yes, unit sales also include sales to
businesses as well as consumers and are not a completely consistent
indicator for retail sales, but the relationship is close as the graph
shows. March's results do point to a rise for the motor vehicle
component of the retail sales report, perhaps to the $100 billion level
in data that will be released later this month. The consumer has been
sitting still so far this year and these results are likely to prove
the year's first major success for consumer spending.
Markets: Caught in an increasing wobble
Session-to-session
volatility has been with us all year but now volatility is spreading
to daily movements, such as Wednesday when a 0.5 percent morning
decline for the Dow transformed into a 1.0 percent gain by the close or
Friday when recovery early in the session fizzled to make way for a 2.3
percent loss. Oversize percentage movements are this year's new norm,
starting in late January when the Dow's 8 percent monthly gain quickly
fell apart following the month-end FOMC statement that upgraded the
risk of inflation. Inflation is still a live landmine with overhead
fire from a tariff war now a new risk. But however much the stock
market has been flying around, the bond market of late has been quiet
and steady. Moves into and out of Treasuries have been limited in what
may, however, be the calm before a storm. Whether accounts still see
Treasuries as a safe haven, given the risks tied to inflation and rising
Fed rates not to mention the risk of a deepening government deficit,
could yet be this year's biggest market story. On the week, the Dow
fell 0.7 percent to 23,932 while the 10-year Treasury yield rose 4
basis points to 2.78 percent.
Markets at a Glance | Year-End | Week Ended | Week Ended | Year-To-Date | Weekly |
2017 | 29-Mar-18 | 6-Apr-18 | Change | Change | |
DJIA | 24,719.22 | 24,103.11 | 23,932.76 | -3.2% | -0.7% |
S&P 500 | 2,673.61 | 2,640.87 | 2,604.47 | -2.6% | -1.4% |
Nasdaq Composite | 6,903.39 | 7,063.44 | 6,915.11 | 0.2% | -2.1% |
Crude Oil, WTI ($/barrel) | $60.15 | $64.94 | $62.00 | 3.1% | -4.5% |
Gold (COMEX) ($/ounce) | $1,305.50 | $1,329.70 | $1,336.70 | 2.4% | 0.5% |
Fed Funds Target | 1.25 to 1.50% | 1.50 to 1.75% | 1.50 to 1.75% | 25 bp | 25 bp |
2-Year Treasury Yield | 1.89% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 38 bp | 0 bp |
10-Year Treasury Yield | 2.41% | 2.74% | 2.78% | 37 bp | 4 bp |
Dollar Index | 92.29 | 90.07 | 90.1 | -2.4% | 0.0% |
The bottom line
Judging by the week's news, the labor market isn't
quite as hot as once thought which should ease concern over wage
inflation, even though wage pressures do appear to be rising. And
underscoring the risk of the inflation was Jerome Powell at week's end
who, in a speech to the Economic Club of Chicago, sounded a bit hawkish
noting that prices have in fact been firming and that inflation
readings may move up "noticeably" this spring. Concern over inflation
may be the key reason why the stock market ultimately tanked on Friday,
not to mention the brewing trade war where, forget about imports, the
nation's exports may be at stake.
No comments:
Post a Comment