Labor is in heavy demand but what nascent
indication of wage inflation that had been appearing may now have
vanished. Does this mean that 4.1 percent unemployment, a rate just
recently thought to be far in excess of full employment, is not full
employment at all? If so, then businesses can continue to find
candidates to meet their rising order books and with this, corporate
profits can climb without being syphoned off by increasing wages. If
not, however, if candidates are in fact about to grow scarce and if
employers begin to raise their offers, wages could begin to move higher
and fast.
The economy
Nonfarm
payrolls rose an outsized 313,000 in February to beat Econoday's high
estimate by more than 80,000. The month's gain is one of the very
largest of the post-2009 expansion in strength underscored by upward
revisions to prior months totaling 54,000. Demand for professional and
business services was especially strong in February with the temporary
help subcomponent spiking 27,000 in a tangible indication that
employers may now be scrambling to fill positions as quickly as they can
and however they can. Retail also showed strength, up 50,000 in
February, as did government with a payroll gain of 26,000. The gains
failed to lower the unemployment rate as discouraged workers came back
in force and were quickly absorbed, lifting the labor force
participation rate by a sharp 3 tenths to 67.0 percent which matches
its best reading of the last four years.
Despite
all this strength, the monthly increase in average hourly earnings
actually came in below expectations at only 0.15 percent (going out two
decimal places is common for monthly inflation data). The trendline in
the graph is flat with the average monthly gain over the last year at
0.22 percent. February's result, judging by Friday's stock-market
reaction, seems to have made a distant memory of the uncomfortable
gains of 0.38 percent in December and 0.45 percent in September or even
the 0.26 percent result of January.
But
it wasn't the monthly gain that caused all the fuss back in January it
was the year-on-year rate, at a 2.9 percent initial reading which
triggered the massive wobble in the stock market. In February this rate
came in very soft, 3 tenths below the consensus at 2.6 percent with
January revised 1 tenth lower to a less intense 2.8 percent. The graph
compares the blue line of this rate against the green line of the
Federal Reserve's central inflation target, the core PCE price index
which has been struggling back toward the Fed's 2 percent goal.
Indications of what to expect for the green line in February will be
part of the coming week's economic data, specifically the core CPI
price index on Tuesday.
Turning
back to payrolls, the real meat of the gains came from two sectors
where employment momentum is building. The year-on-year dollar increase
for construction spending may only be 3.2 percent but construction
jobs are now surging, at 7.2 million as tracked in the green line for a
standout 61,000 February increase. Construction payrolls brushed the 8
million line back in the heyday of the sub-prime housing bubble but
the current ascent back toward this high looks more and more convincing.
Strength is also clear in manufacturing payrolls, at 12.6 million for a
31,000 monthly gain which is the fifth straight solid increase and
consistent with the 6.7 percent yearly gain underway in factory orders.
Note that 20 years ago, manufacturing payrolls were near 18 million in
a level that, given decades of offshoring, looks like an historical
artifact.
Lack
of manufacturing jobs is a structural weakness of the U.S. economy as
is the persistent trade deficit. The week's other economic headlines
come from international trade where the gap deepened to a record $56.6
billion in what is the worst monthly showing of the expansion. A sharp
1.3 percent drop in January exports, to $200.9 billion, was behind the
trouble. Exports of services were steady at $66.7 billion but exports
of goods fell 2.2 percent to $134.2 billion. And here to blame were
industrial supplies, which includes primary metals, down $1.3 billion
to $41.5 billion and also capital goods, a central focus of U.S.
strength that fell $2.6 billion to $44.9 billion and included a $1.8
billion decline in civilian aircraft exports to $3.8 billion. Imports,
unchanged at $257.5 billion, showed increases for industrial supplies
and petroleum but also a welcome downtick in consumer goods which,
however, remain the Achilles Heel of GDP at $54.6 billion. Exports are
going to have to pick up in February and March otherwise first-quarter
GDP, however much payrolls may rise, will be fighting an uphill battle
against an accelerating trade deficit.
Other
data in the week included the ISM non-manufacturing report whose
sample is once again reporting robust conditions, strength however that
has yet to be matched by the "modest-to-moderate" description which the
Federal Reserve's Beige Book keeps repeating. Yet the ISM's
non-manufacturing employment index is proving itself true, trending
higher as tracked in the dotted blue line of the graph and anticipating
the pitch of the dotted green line which is the Labor Department's
total payrolls less manufacturing. Judging by these two trendlines,
payroll gains look to get bigger and bigger which of course would mean
more and more bad nerves at the Fed.
Markets: What rate hikes?
The
stock market turned sharply higher in reaction to the employment
report and its combination of rising payrolls and easing wage pressures.
Friday's 1.8 percent gain for the Dow offers a mirror image of the
huge selloff that began after the January employment report showed a
significant rise in wage pressures and awakened expectations for a
fourth Federal Reserve rate hike this year. Rarely do economic readings
-- in this case average hourly earnings -- create such visible and
specific reactions in the market. But other markets showed less
reaction especially Treasuries which are also super sensitive to
economic data and where the absence of movement hints at less certainty
whether the Fed will in fact stay pat at three hikes.
Markets at a Glance | Year-End | Week Ended | Week Ended | Year-To-Date | Weekly |
2017 | 2-Mar-18 | 9-Mar-18 | Change | Change | |
DJIA | 24,719.22 | 24,538.06 | 25,335.74 | 2.5% | 3.3% |
S&P 500 | 2,673.61 | 2,691.25 | 2,786.57 | 4.2% | 3.5% |
Nasdaq Composite | 6,903.39 | 7,257.87 | 7,560.81 | 9.5% | 4.2% |
Crude Oil, WTI ($/barrel) | $60.15 | $61.46 | $62.06 | 3.2% | 1.0% |
Gold (COMEX) ($/ounce) | $1,305.50 | $1,322.00 | $1,323.00 | 1.3% | 0.1% |
Fed Funds Target | 1.25 to 1.50% | 1.25 to 1.50% | 1.25 to 1.50% | 0 bp | 0 bp |
2-Year Treasury Yield | 1.89% | 2.24% | 2.27% | 38 bp | 3 bp |
10-Year Treasury Yield | 2.41% | 2.86% | 2.90% | 49 bp | 4 bp |
Dollar Index | 92.29 | 89.96 | 90.13 | -2.3% | 0.2% |
The bottom line
Policy makers at the Fed can afford to be a little
patient given that overall inflation rates have remained subdued. But
the gains in hiring are prodigious and are coming after a long run of
economic expansion, meaning that the availability of labor, including
highly qualified labor, is likely to be increasingly limited especially
if fiscal stimulus begins to accelerate demand. If indications on
wages begin to move higher, it would not be unreasonable to expect the
markets, as they did back in January, to begin adjusting once again to
less gradual monetary policy.
No comments:
Post a Comment