Economic policy is now facing the inevitable
moment of crunch between an aggressive fiscal policy aimed at spurring
growth and a monetary policy aimed at cooling growth. Tweeting on
Friday that "tightening now hurts all we have done," President Trump
made clear this last week what his economic advisor Larry Kudlow had
said earlier this month, that the Fed should go easy on rate hikes and
not offset stimulus from the tax cut and the rise in government
spending.
The economy
In
the classic days of monetary policy during the 1980s and 1990s, calls
for easier monetary policy from elected leaders often raised talk of
retaliatory rate hikes by the central bank, a demonstration of
independence that the old Bundesbank was famous for. This is not the
risk right now as Jerome Powell repeated during his semi-annual
testimony on Capitol Hill that "we stay in our lane at the Fed" and, in
reference to the administration, "it's not our job to criticize their
activities." Powell's comments were made at mid-week but comments from
St. Louis Fed President James Bullard at week's end offer what can
likely be expected for Fedspeak to come, that the president has a right
to enter the debate but Fed monetary policy makers, who by statute are
narrowly focused on keeping inflation low and employment high, won't
be swayed. And in fact the unmistakable takeaway from Powell's
testimony is that the Fed, wanting to limit capacity stress and needing
to build out policy room for future rate cuts should a recession loom,
is committed to a continuing series of gradual rate hikes. The graph
tracks the 2-year Treasury, the shortest maturity on the coupon yield
curve and one, as you can see, that moves directly in line with the
Federal funds target rate. The FOMC in their last meeting in June raised
the number of 25-basis-point rate hikes they expect for the remainder
of the year from one to two and along with the three hikes they see for
next year, would take the funds rate over 3 percent. And where should
we expect the 2-year yield to move along the way? Up is the short
answer.
What's
also at stake is the administration's trade efforts as rising rates
hint at a rising dollar, a result that would make U.S. goods and
services more expensive to foreign buyers and less competitive
globally. And a rate-based rise in the dollar could be extended if
foreign competitors, in an effort to offset the effects of U.S. import
tariffs, are tempted to actively lower the value of their currencies.
Devaluations among our trading partners would stimulate their imports
and, by pushing up dollar prices, make U.S. exports yet more expensive.
The Chinese currency hit a one-year low during the week with forward
contracts pointing to deeper lows ahead. The president, in further
tweets, blamed the strength of the dollar on currency "manipulation" by
both China and the European Union. Yet the effect of a rising funds
rate on the dollar is much less clear than for the 2-year Treasury
yield. As seen on the graph, the dollar, whose value is tied not only
to U.S. rates but also to the strength or weakness of foreign
currencies, doesn't necessarily move in line with the funds rate.
Aside from the 2-year yield and the value of the
dollar, the 10-year Treasury yield is a third major financial factor to
watch. This yield, as tracked in the blue line of the graph, only
vaguely shadows the direction of the funds rate though it has been on
the rebound the last several years as the Fed started raising rates. The
comparatively low level of the 10-year yield in part reflects the
economy's low inflation risk which gives investors confidence to lock
in a rate for the long term. Global uncertainty is another factor
keeping the rate low, that is investors seeking to lock in safety are
bidding down the yield. The green line in the graph is the 30-year
fixed mortgage rate which, as you can see, is tied directly to the
10-year Treasury. Whether these long-term rates will rise as the funds
rate rises is unknown, but their ongoing rise, though limited, may
already be holding back the housing sector.
In
an unexpected downturn, housing starts as well as permits both fell
sharply to their lowest rates since September last year. Housing starts
dropped a monthly 12.3 percent to a 1.173 million annualized rate in
June with permits down 2.2 percent to 1.273 million, both far below
Econoday's consensus range. Weakness was most pronounced in the Midwest
though all regions showed declines. The only good news in the report
came from single-family permits which rose 0.8 percent to an 850,000
rate which, however, was far from reversing a 2.3 percent drop in May.
Housing completions were unchanged in June with a gain for multi-units
offsetting an unwelcome decline in single-family homes for a new home
market that is starving for immediate supply. Mortgage rates are still
affordable yet they are, along with the 10-year Treasury yield, at 4-1/2
year highs. But perhaps a more urgent factor holding down starts and
permits is economic not financial, that is physical shortages of
construction goods and available labor.
The
Federal Reserve was heavily in the news during the week not the least
of which with the Beige Book at mid-week, a compilation of verbal
assessments based on the Fed's nationwide business contacts. After
getting what proved to be a very brief upgrade in the May edition, the
Beige Book's July assessment slipped back to modest-to-moderate. The
step back is to blame in part on early tariff effects for metals and
lumber where prices are rising and shortages and dislocations are
appearing. Lack of available labor was cited across all 12 of the Fed's
districts especially shortages of specialized construction and
manufacturing workers. The graph tracks input prices (light green area)
along with selling prices (dark green area) of the New York Fed's
Empire State manufacturing survey, both of which are at the highest
levels since the early days and easy comparisons of the ongoing
economic expansion.
Parallel
data from the Mid-Atlantic manufacturing survey published by the
Philly Fed are clearly at their highest levels of the expansion. The
Philly Fed's index on input prices (light blue) surged more than 11
points this month to 62.9, one of the highest readings on record to
indicate the sharpest rise in month-to-month prices since July 2008.
And some of these costs, like in the Empire State sample, are being
passed through to customers as selling prices (dark blue) rose more
than 3 points to 36.3 which is also among the highest on record. What's
also notable in July's Philly Fed report is a down move, one likely
tied to tariffs, in the overall 6-month outlook which fell nearly 6
points to 29.0 and a 2-year low. But tariff effects or not, orders keep
pouring in and raise the question whether this sample, given shortages
and delivery delays, can keep up with all the demand.
Not
keeping up with demand, in what so far is a positive for the economy,
are inventories. But inventories are up, rising a solid 0.4 percent in
lagging data for May with wholesalers and retailers showing the biggest
builds. Rising inventories are an immediate positive for GDP and,
because these increases are well behind sales growth, the need to build
inventories further is a future positive for both production and
employment. Sales growth for this data set jumped 1.4 percent in May in a
mismatch with inventories that pulled the inventory-to-sales ratio
down to an even leaner 1.34 vs 1.35 in April and March. Year-on-year
comparisons really tell the story with inventories up only 4.4 percent
vs an 8.6 percent gain for sales. Sales data in May were led by
wholesalers and retailers which calls to mind the prior week's producer
price report where trade services, which track costs at wholesalers
and retailers, showed visible price pressures. Businesses may be having
trouble keeping up with demand but inventories still need to move
higher.
Strength
in the economy is nowhere more apparent than in the labor market. The
complement to the labor shortages cited in the Beige Book is the
unusually low level of unemployment claims being filed, an indication
that employers are holding tightly to their existing staffs. Initial
jobless claims fell 8,000 in the July 14 week to a 207,000 level that
is the lowest since December 1969. Continuing claims, where data lag by
a week, edged 8,000 higher to 1.751 million which is just off a low
last seen in 1972. And summing it up best, the unemployment rate for
insured workers remains at only 1.2 percent. Timing and related
statistical adjustments for summer retooling shutdowns in the auto
sector are always wildcards at this time of year, yet the signal from
this report is nevertheless crystal clear: demand for labor is
unusually strong.
Markets: Foreign disinvestment in U.S. stocks
Strength
in the dollar means that foreign buyers of U.S. stocks get fewer
shares for their money, which may help explain a recent exodus of
foreign money from the domestic stock market. Foreign accounts sold a
net $26.6 billion of U.S. stocks in May in what was the heaviest
selling in nearly four years. This follows heavy selling in February as
well as, at $21.5 billion, and also helps explain this year's
relatively tame gains for some of the indexes including the Dow which
is only up a year-to-date 1.4 percent. Rising Treasury yields may also
be a factor, offering foreign investors an increasingly attractive
alternative to stocks. Buying of Treasuries by private foreign accounts
was very heavy in April and May, totaling $93.8 billion.
Markets at a Glance | Year-End | Week Ended | Week Ended | Year-To-Date | Weekly |
2017 | 13-Jul-18 | 20-Jul-18 | Change | Change | |
DJIA | 24,719.22 | 25,019.41 | 25,058.12 | 1.4% | 0.2% |
S&P 500 | 2,673.61 | 2,801.31 | 2,801.83 | 4.8% | 0.0% |
Nasdaq Composite | 6,903.39 | 7,825.98 | 7,820.20 | 13.3% | -0.1% |
Crude Oil, WTI ($/barrel) | $60.15 | $70.76 | $70.21 | 16.7% | -0.8% |
Gold (COMEX) ($/ounce) | $1,305.50 | $1,241.60 | $1,231.20 | -5.7% | -0.8% |
Fed Funds Target | 1.25 to 1.50% | 1.75 to 2.00% | 1.75 to 2.00% | 50 bp | 0 bp |
2-Year Treasury Yield | 1.89% | 2.58% | 2.60% | 71 bp | 2 bp |
10-Year Treasury Yield | 2.41% | 2.83% | 2.89% | 48 bp | 6 bp |
Dollar Index | 92.29 | 94.74 | 94.44 | 2.3% | -0.3% |
The bottom line
The unfolding clash between the increasing
stimulus of fiscal policy and the slowing stimulus of monetary policy
is a tractor pull of sorts, powerful forces working in opposite
directions. And a key financial instrument that is gaining more and
more in importance is the 2-year Treasury yield. Should it continue to
climb as the Fed raises rates, short-term borrowing costs will rise and
slow economic growth at the same time that a likely cross with the
10-year yield -- yield curve inversion -- will have the Fed under more
pressure than just from the president.
No comments:
Post a Comment