The pace of developments in the economy has been
picking up sharply over the last several weeks. The Fed is no longer
trying to lift inflation but, given easy comparisons and rising oil
prices, may instead be scrambling to get out in front of it very soon.
The week's news also includes an unexpectedly weak performance for the
consumer that belies the Fed's assurance spending was picking up. We'll
also take a look at exports, which are the likely target of tariff
reprisals, and also home prices which appear to be slowing.
The economy
Inflation
may be accelerating a little faster than scheduled this year. The core
PCE index jumped to a year-on-year 2.0 percent in May, up from 1.8
percent in April and March and up from a very subdued 5-month run at 1.5
percent. To be fair, the Fed has been warning us about this all along
saying in January that the 2 percent target would be hit sometime "this
year" then in March saying inflation would "move up" in the medium
term. Then in rising anticipation, the Fed in May highlighted the
upside area of risk stressing the "symmetry" of its target and its
commitment to protect against an overshoot. The 2.0 percent result
already hits the FOMC's median for the year, a forecast that was
upgraded just a couple of weeks ago, and is 1 tenth away from the
FOMC's high range for the year. Data comparisons with this time last
year look easy which should limit the shock if the core goes right
through what the FOMC was expecting.
And
the overall PCE price index (which is more volatile than the core) is
already beyond target, jumping from 2.0 percent to 2.3 percent in June
vs the FOMC median estimate for 2.1 percent this year and a high
estimate for 2.2 percent. Year-ago comparisons for this reading also
look easy and the rising price of oil, now well over $70 and
approaching $75, should make an increasing overshoot this summer no
surprise either. But there is one piece that isn't pointing to an
inflation overshoot, and that's the green line in the graph: Average
hourly earnings remain contained despite a very low unemployment rate
and a very high number of job openings. Should average hourly earnings
in next week's employment report, however, show sudden acceleration,
talk will certainly increase that the Fed will raise rates, not twice
more, but three times more this year.
An
even bigger surprise in the personal income & outlays report comes
from consumer spending which managed only a 0.2 percent gain to fall
below Econoday's consensus range. The subdued result is not at all
consistent with the FOMC's verdict back at mid-month that consumer
spending was "picking up." And given what was standout strength in
retail sales data posted at mid-month, the result came in from the
blue. Nondurables did their share in the month, rising 0.6 percent on
high energy prices, but durables came in at only a 0.1 percent gain as
did services which make up the bulk of consumer spending. May's
consumer results point to a knock down for second-quarter GDP
estimates, making outside calls for a 5 percent quarter history.
If
consumer spending isn't "picking up" after all, what should we expect
for the summer months? Employment is very strong which is the most
important factor of all and consumer confidence readings, with strength
centered in the assessment of current conditions, remain very
favorable. High energy prices may hold down non-energy spending but, in
an offset, spending for utilities and at gas stations looks to show
strength. But there's a wildcard. Questions over tariffs are beginning
to surface at the consumer level and appear to be holding down
expectations with this reading showing a June dip in both the consumer
sentiment and consumer confidence reports. As tracked in the
accompanying graph, the blue line from the sentiment report is down
nearly 3 points to 86.3 while the green line of confidence is down 4
points to 103.2. In a special question in the sentiment report, one
quarter of the sample cited the potential impact of tariffs as an issue
in what is a direct echo of the Chicago PMI sample for June where one
quarter of this sample, which here are Chicago-area businesses, said
tariffs are already affecting purchasing decisions.
Let's
now consider what the actual effects of tariffs have been so far. The
initial shot across the bow in what may become a tariff war was the 25
percent duties on imported steel and 10 percent on imported aluminum
that were imposed in March. These led initially to big jumps for
domestic orders of primary metals and also fabrications which are
indirectly affected. But tariff-driven demand for the domestic factory
sector totals no more than $1 billion at most based on gains that were
centered in March and April but faded in May. Import tarrifs may have
helped total orders (the blue columns of the graph) peak at $253
billion in March and hold at $250 billion in April. But with May edging
back to $249 billion, the question whether steel and aluminum tariffs
will continue to stimulate domestic orders is still unanswered.
Whether
tariffs will stem metal imports is also still playing out. Imports for
primary metals jumped very sharply in March, up a monthly 20 percent to
$9.1 billion but then fell back to $8.9 billion in April with this
breakdown for May not yet available. But some advance data for May are
available and help focus our attention on what's at risk in a trade war
for the U.S. economy. Exports of goods surged 2.1 percent in May to
$143.6 billion led by a 12.8 percent monthly jump in foods & feeds
and a 3.7 percent gain for capital goods which are the nation's
strongest exports. And consumer goods also rose, up 3.2 percent.
Including exports of services, which is another major U.S. strength,
the nation's export total rises to $211 billion in full trade data for
April. Over the 12 months from May last year to April this year, the
nation's exports totaled $2.395 trillion for a year-on-year gain of 10.9
percent. This is one of the outstanding rates of growth in the entire
economy and this, as highlighted by Harley Davidson's decision to move
production to Europe, is what's at stake in a trade war.
Turning
back to the home front, housing prices seem to be cooling in what is
probably good news for the sustainability of overall economic growth but
nevertheless is a surprise given how few homes there are on the
market. The FHFA house price index, the blue columns in the graph,
barely edged higher on a monthly basis while the year-on-year, which
peaked at 7.4 percent early in the year, is down to 6.4 percent in the
latest data. Case-Shiller's 20-city adjusted index, the green area of
the graph, likewise managed only a small monthly increase with this
yearly rate slipping to 6.6 percent. Similar indications of price
slowing have been coming from both the new home and existing home
reports. The results, appearing at the beginning of the Spring sales
push, suggest that housing may be in a buyer's market right now.
Slowing
appreciation in home prices would not be a positive for household
wealth which, however, is on solid ground based on the most important
factor of all in the economy -- the labor market. Payroll growth has
been very solid and the unemployment rate, down 1 tenth in May to 3.8
percent, is only 2 tenths above where the FOMC sees it going this year.
And based on weekly unemployment claims, another notch to 3.7 percent
in the June employment report would not be a major surprise. Initial
jobless claims did rise slightly in the June 23 week but the 4-week
average, at 222,000, compares favorably with levels in May. Continuing
claims, where data lag by a week, posted a sizable decline with this
4-week average at 1.720 million and a new 45-year low. And talking
about unemployment rates, the rate for insured workers is only 1.2
percent.
Markets: The unbearable heaviness of oil
Jerome
Powell already warned us at the mid-month FOMC press conference that
high oil prices may very well push inflation above the 2 percent
target, at least temporarily he said. Whether his outlook anticipated
the current acceleration toward $75 is unknown as is whether his
outlook included the political controversy surrounding Iran. Tariffs
are the weapon that President Trump is showing in his efforts to
isolate Iran, warning that the U.S. may impose tariffs on countries
trading with the giant oil producer. Forget about capacity stress, or
tariffs on metals, or the unavailability of labor because when it comes
to impacting inflation, oil is in its own league. A further run
higher, whether based on politics or OPEC production or market
speculation, could upend expectations for gradual rate hikes, forcing
the Fed to protect the upside of its inflation target with urgency.
Markets at a Glance | Year-End | Week Ended | Week Ended | Year-To-Date | Weekly |
2017 | 22-Jun-18 | 29-Jun-18 | Change | Change | |
DJIA | 24,719.22 | 24,580.89 | 24,271.41 | -1.8% | -1.3% |
S&P 500 | 2,673.61 | 2,754.88 | 2,718.37 | 1.7% | -1.3% |
Nasdaq Composite | 6,903.39 | 7,692.82 | 7,510.30 | 8.8% | -2.4% |
Crude Oil, WTI ($/barrel) | $60.15 | $69.23 | $74.35 | 23.6% | 7.4% |
Gold (COMEX) ($/ounce) | $1,305.50 | $1,272.10 | $1,252.90 | -4.0% | -1.5% |
Fed Funds Target | 1.25 to 1.50% | 1.75 to 2.00% | 1.75 to 2.00% | 50 bp | 0 bp |
2-Year Treasury Yield | 1.89% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 63 bp | −3 bp |
10-Year Treasury Yield | 2.41% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 44 bp | −4 bp |
Dollar Index | 92.29 | 94.55 | 94.64 | 2.5% | 0.1% |
The bottom line
Consumer spending makes up more than two thirds of
GDP and the unexpected weakness for May points to less second-quarter
acceleration than expected. This though is eclipsed in importance by
the increase in core inflation coupled with the ongoing risk that
significant pressure from oil prices may kick in as well. These are big
results that are big surprises. The economy, stable and predictable for
so long, may be entering a summer of uncertainty.
No comments:
Post a Comment